Buy a fake electric shaver, rage against the fraud of the mall was refuted

The philips razors were purchased as aquatic goods and could not be used in mainland China. Mr. Liu sued a trade center in tongzhou district for three times of compensation for fraud. A tongzhou court recently ordered the defendant to return the goods and refund the money, but did not consider it fraudulent.

On the New Year's day of 2015, Mr. Liu purchased two philips PT724 razors at a trade center in tongzhou district at a price of 1,280 yuan. In mid-january, he again to the commercial center bought ten types of razor above, send some razor to friends after use, but a friend feedback razors have quality problem, cannot use. Mr. Liu found that the shaver had no Chinese mark and that the electric plug did not meet the safety standards set by the state and there was no after-sales service. Believing that the trade center was fraudulent, Mr. Liu sued the other party to return the payment and assume three times the total compensation of more than 60,000 yuan.

After court that goods sold operators should be able to first in mainland China safe use, look from the exterior no razor involved in the Chinese label, commodity plug in the power adapter with perforation, belong to has been out of substandard products, when used with risk and hazard. The philips shaver sold by the business center cannot be used normally, so it supports Mr. Liu's lawsuit for returning the goods and returning the payment for goods. Court at the same time, points out that fraud is refers to the operators in the process of providing goods or services to false or other improper means to cheat and mislead consumers, damage to the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, on the basis of consumers' rights and interests protection law should be punished and the behavior of accountability. Mr Liu said when buying the razor was found without any Chinese label on the outer packing, we did not provide enough evidence to prove the defendants fraud, reason to reject it requires the defendant three times the amount of the claims for compensation.